//
you're reading...

California Real Estate

Has Housing Entered A Never-Ending Tailspin?

For a while in 2010, some economists thought that real estate prices had reached a bottom and would soon begin their ascent back to the bubble year’s prices. Soon, they all found out that prices were being artificially inflated by the first time homebuyers’ tax credit.  Now the question is, when are prices going to stop falling and reach a bottom?

There is a unique phenomenon taking place in some REO saturated areas that appears to be making prices spin out of control in a seemingly never-ending tailspin into the abyss.

First let’s take a look at the amount of equity people have in their home that have mortgages.

 

 

What is important about this chart is that the further underwater someone is, the less likely they are to continue to make mortgage payments. There is a mental threshold near the -20% to -25% equity range as people really start considering non-payment.

Which brings us to the next part of the puzzle: delinquencies. As you can see, these numbers are not historically normal as delinquencies usually hover in the 5-6% area. Having a delinquency rate close to 13% is indicative of an out of whack economy. More importantly, it is clear that people are strategically defaulting.

 

 

Notice the large volume of loans in “90 days late” category in the chart above. Fewer than 1% of loans that are 90 days delinquent are made current before foreclosure, so you can go ahead and kiss these suckers goodbye.

And then we have the big boy: SUPPLY. Because of the number of delinquencies, there seems to be a never-ending supply slugging through the inventory pipeline. With close to 7 million loans in some stage of delinquency, there is literally no telling when the trend in the graph below is going to change.

 

 

 

 

 

A total of more than 2 million houses are in some stage of the foreclosure process. We also know that, in some cases, people are living in their homes without paying a mortgage for two years before a notice of default is even filed. This chart does not account for situations like that.

Here is where it gets really tricky… The more foreclosures in a certain area, the steeper the discount is when they are resold.  For example, in California, where more than 44% of all sales are foreclosures, the average foreclosed home is sold at a 34% discount.

So when this volume of discounted houses hits the market, what happens?

People’s houses go further underwater, making them more likely to default, which adds to the supply, which are sold at a discount, which means people’s houses go further underwater….

And where does this cycle end? That’s a good question that few analysts are actually discussing.  The answer is simple, income.  The problem is that income levels have remained stagnant for the last decade while national real estate prices shot through the moon.  Until income levels begin to rise, real estate prices will fall until historical ratios are reached.

 

- Hunter Thompson

 Subscribe by email in the top right corner.

Discussion

6 Responses to “Has Housing Entered A Never-Ending Tailspin?”

  1. Hunter, great post. And I completely agree – now that we’re back to traditional lending standards, it’s very, very simple equation. Either incomes have to rise or prices have to fall so that we hit our traditional ratios that equate with bank lending standards and requirements. Unfortunately it appears as though we are heading into a multi year deflationary period for housing, unless incomes suddenly increase, which I don’t think anyone is expecting. Thanks again for the great post, Jeremy

    Posted by Investor J | June 17, 2011, 8:09 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] ratios, this would not surprise me at all.   If this drop were to continue, it would have a compounding effect on the economy, as well as consumer [...]

  2. [...] the market.  Imagine that you were trying to sell in Los Angeles, before the limits changed. You originally valued your property at $700,000, what do you think it is worth now? It is likely that the comps you will use to value [...]

  3. [...] is 15.3% below May 2010.  The latter number is a little “skewed up” due to the fact that the first-time homebuyer’s tax credit was about to expire during May 2010, so some of the sales at that time could be attributed to buyers scrambling to [...]

  4. [...] I am sure that you have heard that the best time to be investing is when markets are volatile because it creates the greatest margin for profit.  Do yourself a favor and wipe this thought from your head.  Volatility is the enemy of financial planning. While rent-to-price ratios can tell a lot about a market’s ability to cash flow, the market’s history of volatility is also important when considering a real estate investment.  For instance, Las Vegas rent-to-price ratios are well above the 1% discussed earlier. When you dig deeper into the data, you will see why volatility is also something important to consider.  Since the 2008 crash, Las Vegas real estate has lost more than 60% of its value and prices continue to fall rapidly as the massive amounts of foreclosures work their way through the pipeline. Other cities where the rent to price ratios make sense but volatility has proven to be too wild are markets like Phoenix, Miami, and Tampa.  All these cities have suffered more than 47% decrease in values since the 2009 peak. When you hear this type of value depreciation, it is important to remember that the high number of houses that are deeply underwater encourage people to stop paying their mortgage and allow their house to be foreclosed on.  This creates a vicious cycle, bringing down prices even further. [...]

  5. [...] ratios, this would not surprise me at all.   If this drop were to continue, it would have a compounding effect on the economy, as well as consumer [...]

Post a Comment

ALL POSTS